🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold move to ban social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples around the globe. Officials, child protection groups, and families are observing intently to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for other nations.

European Momentum

In Europe, a growing group of states are moving toward similar bans.

• Denmark has announced a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister stating that smartphones and networks are "stealing our kids' youth". The policy is expected to be enacted soon.
• The Norwegian government is planning to implement a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard children from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is introducing a digital ID system to authenticate the age and identity of social media participants. The media minister have stated that an Australia-style ban could be "a potential options on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has called on parliament to enact a bill raising the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has endorsed a related move, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The government in the Netherlands has urged families to block their children from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has approved a symbolic motion demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 without a parent decides otherwise is granted. Even though it highlights of the "habit-forming" design of these apps, the resolution does not create binding law.

"A strong age limit is a useful first step," commented a leading parliamentarian behind the resolution.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Eye

In the UK, the government has not ruled out a future ban, emphasizing that "no option is being dismissed" but stressing any decision must be "supported by strong data".

Earlier, momentum gathered behind a bill to enact limits on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately modified. However, the administration pledged to further research the matter.

Advocacy groups have raised concerns. An organization founded by the relatives of a teenager who was lost after encountering harmful platform posts contends that a strict age ban might not improve online safety and could lead to a "cliff edge" of harm when users become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the failure of the tech sector to design products and services that are safe and age appropriate for young users," said a prominent peer.

The US: A Fragmented Approach

Stateside, regulation is largely occurring at the state level amid country-wide inaction.

• Utah mandates adult approval for under-18s to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• Florida has signed a bill prohibiting children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a law limiting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with extra time dependent on adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also enacted laws requiring parental consent for minors to create social media profiles.

Even with widespread concern and calls from certain individuals to follow the Australian path, a nationwide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Outlook

Outside of the West, other states are also considering moves.

• The Malaysian government intends to prohibit social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has raised the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, international organizations strike a more nuanced stance. A major UN agency has advised that social media bans have downsides and "may even prove counterproductive". The agency notes that the internet can be a "critical link" for marginalized children and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to prioritize safety.

As this international debate continues, the actions of Australia and several other countries demonstrate that states globally are increasingly willing to stand by for platforms to act voluntarily.